9 steps to a more humane and effective refugee policy

Today, intense and unrelenting conflicts have driven more people from their homes than ever before. 65 million people are displaced globally, including 21 million refugees - half of them children.

Governments simply aren’t keeping pace.

The immense scale of the global refugee crisis is challenging policymakers across the world. They need to offer protection and dignity to a dramatically higher number of people while preventing deaths at sea and addressing local concerns about border protection.

These are complex issues with no easy solutions but one thing is crystal clear: Australia’s current approach is failing.

UNICEF Australia has joined with Save the Children to investigate the full human, economic and strategic costs of Australia’s refugee policy and the results are worse than most people would ever imagine. Read this blog for a summary or take a closer look at the full report: At What Cost?

There are some areas where Australia is doing well. We have a positive humanitarian resettlement program that we can continue to grow in coming years. But other areas of policy, like our offshore processing, are falling short. In fact, they are causing incredible harm.

So what’s the alternative?

We believe Australia can reduce the incentive for asylum seekers to risk dangerous boat journeys without resorting to harsh policies of deterrence. Instead, we can and must invest in a comprehensive regional solution to give asylum seekers and refugees other paths to protection.  

Here’s how.

1. Reaffirm Australia’s commitment to the Refugee Convention

It all starts with the Government publicly affirming its commitment to the letter and spirit of the Refugee Convention. In particular, we don’t want people turned back to likely persecution. Let’s show the world we still believe in taking a fair share of responsibility for the challenges of a global refugee crisis.
 

2. Urgently resettle refugees from Nauru and Manus Island

We’re urging the Government to publicly commit to a timeline for the resettlement of refugees from offshore processing centres.
Australia should take full responsibility for finding a safe and permanent solution. If it refuses to bring the refugees to Australia, it must ensure any third countries can provide:
 

• Access to healthcare and education
• Freedom of movement, including a guarantee that refugees won’t be kept in immigration detention
• Protection against refoulement (the forced return of asylum seekers to places where they may face persecution)
• Access to work rights
• Settlement services to help with the challenges of social integration
• Prospects for separated families to reunite

Each person deserves to have an individual assessment on whether a third country is appropriate for their particular vulnerabilities and circumstances. And the best interests of a child should always be the primary consideration in decisions that affect them.

3. Legislate to ensure children are never again harmed by mandatory and prolonged immigration detention

There’s international consensus that putting children in immigration detention is against their best interests and a violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

It’s time for the Government to introduce legislation to permanently end the immigration detention of children in Australia or in any other settings funded, facilitated or supported by the Australian Government. Let it never happen again.
 

4. Re-open pathways for resettlement of refugees from Indonesia

In 2014, Australia announced it would no longer accept refugees seeking resettlement from Indonesia if they arrived after 1 July that year.

The move was intended to deter asylum seekers from travelling to Indonesia but it’s now clear that, rather than ‘draining the pool’ of people in Indonesia, this policy has created a backlog. Children, families and other asylum seekers are stuck in limbo. In the absence of additional resettlement pathways, it’s unclear how the policy could have had any other result.

We’re joining with the UNHCR and the Indonesian Government in calling for Australia to immediately revoke its ban on the resettlement of refugees from Indonesia.
 

5. Reveal the true financial costs of Australia’s refugee policies

Years of secrecy have prevented the Australian public from making informed decisions on whether the Government’s harsh treatment of asylum seekers is a necessary or effective use of tax dollars.

The Government should commit to providing more transparent information on the true fiscal cost of Australia’s refugee policies, starting with a full audit of public expenditure since 2013.

 

6. Significantly increase Australia’s humanitarian intake

Last year, only 107,100 refugees were able to access resettlement places globally, leaving almost all of the world’s 21 million refugees with little prospect of finding protection in a safe country.

The Australian Government is gradually increasing its humanitarian intake to 18,750 over four years but has made no commitment to maintain or continuing growing this level beyond 2018-19.

Australia can and should do more by scaling up our humanitarian intake of refugees at a level befitting our population and prosperity. We’ve done it before: in 1979-80 Australia granted 19,954 places and in 1980-81 it offered 22,545.

Given how much our population has grown and that our economy is now three times larger, we propose Australia could very feasibly accept 30,000 refugees by 2018-19 while still allowing for additional placements in response to unforeseen emergencies.

7. Proactively work with our neighbours to establish a regional protection framework

We know many forced migrants move on from host and transit countries when their basic rights to safety, employment and a decent standard of living are unfulfilled. So if Australia wants asylum seekers in our region to wait for safe, orderly and durable ways to migrate, we need to ensure their temporary situations are liveable.

The Australian Government needs to work with its international peers to create and fund a comprehensive system of humanitarian protection for South East Asia. This new framework would provide refugees with:
 

• Safe and accessible places to disembark from boats and, for those crossing land borders, safe systems to move between countries
• Legal recognition which protects them from immigration detention
• Adequate shelter, physical security, food, water and sanitation
• Work rights and/or financial assistance
• Primary and secondary education
• Freedom of movement
• Protection from refoulement and other human rights abuses
• Family reunification
• Timely and fair processing of claims to asylum and resettlement

There’s no doubt it’s a highly ambitious project but many of these measures have already been proven possible in places like Iran, Pakistan, India and Hong Kong. And ultimately, people fleeing persecution deserve nothing less.

 

8. Transition from boat turn-backs to search and rescue

Turning boats back from Australia doesn’t even seek to find a solution for asylum seekers - it simply abandons them. It’s unacceptable to think this could be the end of our responsibility to people who need our protection.

Creating the regional protection system described above would allow boat turn-backs to be phased out and replaced with search and rescue operations. The Australian Government could work together with its peers to identify people at risk on the sea and ensure their safe arrival at agreed locations throughout the region. Critically, we wouldn’t just be turning asylum seekers away to face new dangers - we would be connecting them to protection and support services.

9. Help refugees access non-humanitarian visas

Let’s not forget that refugees are so much more than that label. They’re doctors, teachers and engineers who can offer a lot to Australia and often qualify for other migrant visas.

The Australian Government can help by investigating the barriers that stop refugees from accessing our broader migration programme. It can also work with host and transit countries to actively facilitate visa applications. This might include:​
 

• Widely distributing visa information in relevant languages
• Opening Departmental outposts in key overseas locations
• Developing a system to refer qualified candidates to Australian employers seeking overseas candidates
• Waiving or deferring some visa fees and document requirements

 

We can rise to the challenge

This new way forward won’t be quick, simple or cheap. It won’t be a perfect solution.

But we know the solution doesn’t look like the child abuse, self-harm and despair we’ve seen on Nauru. It doesn’t look like the closed doors and turned backs of the Australian Government while people fleeing persecution are left to suffer - as long as it’s somewhere else.

A real solution looks like safety on land and sea; like children in schools, parents with basic working rights and people with health care - both here in Australia and wherever they need protection throughout our region.

It will require a bold funding commitment but surely this long-term solution is a better investment than the $9.6 billion which has squandered on Australia’s short-sighted and harmful response to asylum seekers since 2013.

Yes, the global refugee crisis is horrifyingly large. 65 million people are displaced and Australia can’t help every one of them. But we can do our fair share and the size of the challenge is no reason to become fearful and turn inward.

Every one of these children, families and individuals left home with hope for a better life. They set out with faith that nations like Australia would honour our commitments to meet persecuted people with shelter and protection. It’s time to show them our true generosity.

Step by step, we can forge a new path.